Hero Icon Image

2026 Rock Integrated Services Survey

With an ever growing list of companies offering services in the Rock RMS space, we asked the community to share their experience with vendors.

Communication


Clearstream's Logo

Clearstream

Visit Website
9.1 / 10 24 Responses

Clearstream is consistently praised as a strong and reliable texting and communication partner, with exceptional customer service standing out as the most frequently highlighted strength across respondents, who describe the team as responsive, proactive, and genuinely supportive. The Rock RMS integration is broadly regarded as smooth and powerful, enabling valuable workflow automation such as intelligent text routing and list management that meaningfully enhances ministry communication. The most common criticism is that not all of Clearstream's features are accessible directly within Rock, which can create workflow confusion for staff who must navigate between platforms. A small number of users noted isolated integration bugs and a desire for continued feature development, but the overwhelming sentiment is one of satisfaction and confidence in Clearstream as a mission-critical partner.

Read More
Powered By Text's Logo

Powered By Text

Visit Website
7.9 / 10 7 Responses

Powered By Text is appreciated by some users as a simpler alternative to managing Twilio and 10DLC compliance independently, with a responsive and caring support team that has demonstrated willingness to address issues and incorporate customer feedback. However, a significant concern raised by multiple respondents is a disconnect between what was promised during the sales process and what was actually delivered post-implementation, with at least one organization describing an abrupt and unannounced pricing model change as particularly damaging to trust. Technical limitations are also noted, including onboarding challenges, throttling issues at scale, and an integration that requires using PBT's own website rather than functioning entirely within Rock's native environment. Overall, sentiment is mixed, with satisfied users finding genuine value in the partnership while others feel misled and have ultimately moved on to alternative solutions.

Read More
Twilio's Logo

Twilio

Visit Website
7.5 / 10 57 Responses

Twilio is broadly regarded as a reliable and functional SMS and communication infrastructure provider with solid Rock RMS integration, competitive pricing, and a dependable platform that largely "just works" for organizations that have it properly configured. The most consistent criticism across respondents is the near-absence of meaningful customer support, with users frequently describing the experience as self-service by necessity, making Twilio a poor fit for organizations without strong internal technical expertise. Setup complexity, particularly around 10DLC compliance and number registration, is a recurring friction point, and rising costs are noted by some as a growing concern. Overall, Twilio is positioned as a capable but impersonal infrastructure tool best suited for technically proficient teams, with a number of organizations having already transitioned or considering a move to more full-featured, church-focused alternatives that offer deeper ministry workflow integration alongside messaging capabilities.

Read More
Intulse's Logo

Intulse

Visit Website
7.0 / 10 8 Responses

Intulse is generally regarded as a capable VOIP partner with a responsive team and a solid Rock RMS integration, though several users note that the integration stops short of being a true, deep connection with Rock, which introduces workflow complications. Customization and flexibility are recurring concerns, with some respondents feeling that product changes have been shortsighted and that the mobile app experience falls below expectations. Pricing is a point of friction, with multiple users finding the cost of VOIP services difficult to justify, particularly as staff phone usage patterns have shifted and recent SMS policy changes have made that feature impractical for some organizations. Overall, sentiment toward Intulse is cautiously positive, but evolving communication habits and cost considerations are leading some organizations to question the long-term fit.

Read More
Survey Processing Methodology

Reviews are displayed in descending order of their average rating.

All reviews in this survey were voluntarily and anonymously submitted by members of the community in response to one of three communicated requests. The responses were free from Rock Partner influence or solicitation, and Spark has refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report represent an average of the individual scores provided by the community.

The comments provided by participants have been consistently summarized using Claude Sonnet 4.6 using the following prompt: Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner [Partner Name]. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and accurate and in a single paragraph. Keep responses less than 4 sentences.

The summarized feedback was edited to remove specific references to any individuals or projects, or overtly negative sentiments.