Powered By Text's Logo
Rock Integrated Vendor

Powered By Text

Communication
Visit Website
7.9 / 10 7 Responses
AI Generated Summary

Powered By Text is appreciated by some users as a simpler alternative to managing Twilio and 10DLC compliance independently, with a responsive and caring support team that has demonstrated willingness to address issues and incorporate customer feedback. However, a significant concern raised by multiple respondents is a disconnect between what was promised during the sales process and what was actually delivered post-implementation, with at least one organization describing an abrupt and unannounced pricing model change as particularly damaging to trust. Technical limitations are also noted, including onboarding challenges, throttling issues at scale, and an integration that requires using PBT's own website rather than functioning entirely within Rock's native environment. Overall, sentiment is mixed, with satisfied users finding genuine value in the partnership while others feel misled and have ultimately moved on to alternative solutions.

Survey Processing Methodology

All reviews in this survey were voluntarily submitted by members of the community, and Spark has refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report represent an average of the community's individual ratings. The comments provided by participants have been consistently summarized using Claude Sonnet 4.6 with the guiding prompt below.

Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner [Partner Name]. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and accurate and in a single paragraph. Keep the responses less than 4 sentences.

It's important to note that a very small subset of ratings was excluded from the analysis for the following reasons:

  1. Submissions that provided a rating score but accompanied it with comments indicating they had insufficient knowledge of the service.
  2. Ratings submitted by integrated partners who rated either themselves or their competitors were omitted from the analysis. These ratings were deemed potentially biased due to a perceived conflict of interest.